
| The Only Website Dedicated To The Ghosts And Hauntings Of Cheshire |
| Home Acton Alderley Edge Alsager Astbury Barthomley Beeston Bosley Bridgemere Church Lawton Church Minshull Crewe Duddon Gawsworth Kidsgrove Mow Cop Sandbach Wincle |
![]() On December 23rd, 1643, a number of Royalist soldiers arrived in Cheshire from Ireland, with the sole intention of taking the town of Nantwich, which, at that time, was under the control of the Parliamentarians. A battle followed, in which the Royalists, led by Lord Byron, were defeated. Quickly regrouping, they spread out into the Cheshire countryside, and overran a small number of villages, eventually arriving at Barthomley. Upon witnessing this, it is believed that a group of about twenty villagers, led by John Fowler, the Rector’s son, decided to stay and fight Byron’s troops. Fowler is said to have fired upon and killed one of the soldiers, which instigated a swift and terrible revenge. The group were hunted down and chased into the Tower of St. Bertoline’s, where they blockaded themselves in. The leader of the Royalist’s, Major Connaught, set fire to pews, rushes, mats and just about anything else that he could get his hands on, in an attempt to smoke out the villagers. After realising the situation was hopeless, the trapped men called for quarter, which was granted by Connaught. As the men came from the Church, they were quickly rounded up, and forced to strip naked, before twelve of the men were barbarically murdered, having their throats cut. It is stated that Major Connaught personally cut the throat of John Fowler, the youngest member of the group. The rest of the men were beaten and left for dead. On Christmas Day, and for the following few days, the Royalist soldiers continued to plunder Barthomley, before moving on and dispatching Crewe, Sandbach, and Haslington, along with the few scattered hamlets in between. It is a fair comment to make, that had he pleaded guilty, one of the charges that King Charles I would have faced would have been the massacre at Barthomley, with the evidence for this coming from parish registers. It is said that during the Winter months, the screams of these twelve desperate men can still be heard, re-enacting the whole vicious scene, whilst visitors to the Church have often reported the smell of smoke. The village of Barthomley has virtually remained unchanged since the early eighteenth century, and it is said that the last wolf in England was captured and killed in the woods that used to surround the village; as a memorial to this, the small brook that runs through the village is called “The Wulvern”, indeed a fitting memorial. Barthomley is said to have its own variation of “Black Shuck”, a huge black dog that stalks the dark country lanes of Norfolk and East Anglia. The dog, whose appearance is said to signify death, is supposedly seen wandering the lanes that surround St. Bertoline’s, and the Old Rectory, and in the Churchyard, at dusk. The spirit of a White Lady has also occasionally been seen walking pensively by herself, in the fields that surround Barthomley, but why she is here, or why she haunts this particular area is not known. ![]() In Ireland, he lived with the Irish King, fell in love with his daughter, made her pregnant, but refused to marry her. Soon after, the pair returned to England, where they both lived a nomadic life in the forests. Whilst he was away hunting for food, the King‘s daughter, and her new born baby, were attacked and killed by wolves. Struck down with grief, Bertillinus turned to God and devoted his life to the almighty. He was challenged by the Devil to turn stone into bread, but he did the opposite and turned bread into stone, which, according to Prior Alexander Essebiensis, can still be seen, at Bertelmesly. Over the centuries, the estate of Barthomley has been owned by a small number of important families, mainly being the Praers, Fulleshurst, and Crewe families, many of whom are buried within the confines of the Church, or the Churchyard. At the beginning of the Norman Conquest, the estate was owned by Siward Thegws, a free man, and was valued at twenty shillings. After a period of upheaval, in which the Danish King Sweyn claimed most of the land in Cheshire, after the invasion of 1069, Barthomley was named as wasteland in William the Conqueror’s Doomsday Survey of 1086, where it was claimed by William Malbedeng. By this time, the village was known as Bertemeleu, when defined, means a “Ley” or a “Clearing”. It is probable that the De Praers’ family leased the manor of Barthomley, a lease they would go on to hold for almost 300 years, and It is likely that, by this time, the foundations for a Church at the village would have been laid. Another powerful family entered the history of Barthomley when Richard Praers, the son of Sir Randle Praers, married Johanna, co-heiress of Thomas de Crewe, an act which led to the unison of the manors of Barthomley and Crewe. Their grand-daughter Elizabeth went on to marry Sir Robert Fulleshurst, who was a squire to Lord Audley during the French Wars. It was around this time, 1576, that the Church was rebuilt in its present form, and several of the black and white cottages that litter the village were also built. In 1561, the Fulleshursts’ got into serious money difficulties and sold the estate to Sir Christopher Hatton, who would later become Lord Chancellor of England. In 1591, when Hatton died, the estate was passed on to Sir William Hatton, and when he too died, Sir Ranulph Crewe purchased the estate, which also included Crewe and Haslington and returned them back to the name of the Crewe family. The main structure of St. Bertoline’s Church is of Cheshire sandstone, built in the traditional Gothic style, and comprises of a solid Tower, that is both crenellated and pinnacled, similar to that of a castle; a Nave, which has two clerestory windows, and north and south aisles that are embattlemented, for the purpose of defence. It is believed that the Church dates from the fifteenth century, but there is evidence that a much earlier building stood before it. A doorway, found at the north aisle, is thought to be of Norman origins, as the “zig-zag” patterns are typical of this period. At one time, to reach the Pulpit, the Rector would have had to go through a doorway, directly adjacent to the arch that leads into the Chancel, but this has since changed since the main arch was altered in 1924. Beneath the Tower, the West window has four bays, all designed in the usual Perpendicular style, whilst its stained glass, rich in colour, depicts the four apostles, which was inserted to respect the memory of Henrietta Hungerford Crewe. Beside the Tower arch are two large oil paintings, depicting the Old Testament brothers Moses and Aaron. During the eighteenth century, these type of pictures were often hung behind the Altar, next to the Ten Commandments. The date of these paintings is unfortunately unknown, as neither of them are signed. Aaron is shown wearing the vestments as the Chief Priest, as described in detail in Exodus, Chapter 28. Situated on his breastplate are twelve precious stones, set entirely in gold, and are engraved with the names of Jacob’s sons, representing the twelve tribes of Israel. On the opposite side of the arch, Moses is wearing the traditional brown robe of a prophet and is carrying his staff of office, with which he could perform miracles. At one point, these paintings were said to have been hung in the Crewe Arms Hotel, and were later presented to the Church by the directors of the North Staffordshire Railway in the nineteenth century. It is thought that they were at Crewe Hall, and then taken to the Crewe Arms Hotel, having been previously rescued from a fire. Hanging to the left of the painting of Aaron is a list of Rectors, who previously served the Parish of Barthomley. These records show that the first official rector of the Church was Robertus de Chissulle, appointed by Edward, Prince of Wales in 1303. The Church Tower, designed and built of red sandstone, dates from the late fifteenth century, and is decorated with the usual gargoyles, pinnacles and carvings. Inside is a collection of eight bells and a bell-ringing chamber, which can be accessed by a spiral staircase at the base, whilst the view from the Tower is well worth seeing. The clock face, which is original, dates from 1710, whilst the works, made by Gabriel Smith, the local clockmaker, were eventually replaced in 1934, after running for some 224 years. The present clock was donated by the Reverend Armistead. Originally, there was a thirteenth century Chancel, built during the reign of Edward I, but this was destroyed when the Church was restored in 1852, where a new one was built. The present Chancel was built in 1924, as a memorial to the two sons of the first and last Marquess of Crewe, both of whom died in early youth, and are now buried in the Churchyard. A craftsman was brought from Liverpool Cathedral, and it was him that carved the arms of the Crewe family, and also the Diocese of Chester. These twentieth century alterations, designed by Paley and Austin, began with the widening of the Nave, and a new roof, with clerestory windows was added, whilst the east wall and its window was removed altogether and replaced. This new and improved Chancel replaced the one from 1852, which many deemed inadequate. Several Rectors, and their wives, are buried within the Chancel, and this includes the Reverend Edward Hinchcliffe, Rector from 1796 to 1819, and his wife. Also included are some members of the Lawton family. To the right of the Altar, there is a small arch, containing an iron grill, dating from 1915, whilst nearby, a much larger arch, with a wrought iron grill and door leads to the Crewe Chapel. Dating from the sixteenth century, the Altar table is richly carved, and depicts the Flight into Egypt, whilst another panel shows the Nativity scene, with shepherds, who are wearing Tudor hats of Puritanical style, bringing gifts, a hare and a bird, to the Baby Jesus. A donkey is carrying Mary and her child, while a squirrel eats a nut, which was an old Cheshire emblem. On the side panels, there are images of cherubs, frolicking around in the ocean, with chariots drawn by sea-horses and dolphins. Underneath the Chapel is a vault, sealed by a bricked-up door, and this contains the remains of Sir Ranulph Crewe, in a stone coffin with an effigy on top, whereas on each side is a row of his descendants, of all ages, among which are John, the first Baron Crewe, and John, the Second Baron. As you enter the Crewe Chapel, to the right, is the alabaster effigy and tomb of Sir Robert Fulleshurst, and this dates from 1390. He was connected to the Parish of Barthomley through his marriage to Elizabeth Praers, heiress of Crewe and Barthomley. He is seen wearing the armour of a fourteenth century Knight, with a conical helmet and collar of chain mail that protects his neck and shoulders. Supporting his feet is a lion, whilst around the sides of his tomb, there are a number of small carved figures, representing members of his family, who are mourning his death; six men can be seen standing on pedestals, facing outwards, whilst six women, turn to face the coffin. During the period of the Black Prince, Sir Robert is recorded as being one of the four Cheshire Squires, who went on to serve James Lord Audley, following him into battle. In 1356, at Poitiers, Lord Audley and his supporters were in the vanguard of the Black Prince’s troops, who fought against the French and won. Sir Robert arrived back home and was well rewarded for his bravery, which ended with a Knighthood by Edward III. The monument that depicts a robed ecclesiastic is almost certainly that of Robert Fulleshurst, who was Barthomley’s Rector from 1475, to 1529. Because he was a Roman Catholic, his tomb had been concealed in a recess in a wall on the other side of the church, in order to protect it from the being destroyed by the Puritans. This monument was discovered some two hundred years ago, and an over zealous workman accidentally tried to scrub it clean with soap and water, to remove dust particles that had gathered, but instead only removed the richly coloured paint; traces of this paint can still be seen within the folds of the robes. Standing in the middle of the Chapel is the exquisite white marbled figure of Sybil Marcia, the wife of Robert Offley Ashburton, the second Baron Houghton; she later became the Marquess of Crewe in 1911. The sculpture is the work of Sir Joseph Edgar Boehm, a favourite of Queen Victoria, and is regarded by many to be his finest piece. Sandwiched between the Crewe Chapel and the South Aisle is an elaborate monument, and is dedicated to the memory of John, the first Baron Crewe, who died at the age of 86, April 28th, 1829. Also in the Chapel, adorning the South wall, is another monument, and this commemorates Anne, the wife of the first Baron Crewe, who died in 1711. As you leave the Chapel, there are four brass plaques, which originally were on graveslabs in the churchyard. These plaques are dedicated to four members of the Malbon family, who resided at Bradley Hall, Haslington. The Malbons were direct descendants of William de Malbedeng, owned the area after the end of the Norman Conquest. Similar to the roof in the South Aisle, the roof in the North Aisle is divided into bays of forty-eight panels, once again beautifully carved with floral and symbolic patterns, but less elaborate than the South Aisle. The organ, constructed by Forster and Andrews of Hull, was presented to the Church by the Crewe family in 1865, and was pumped by hand up until 1963. Above this is a timber, dated 1589, whilst on either side of the North Chapel is a sixteenth century screen, and is believed to be of Welsh origin. It is inscribed with verses from the Old Testament. ![]() It is a fair comment to make, that had he pleaded guilty, King Charles I would have been charged with the Massacre of Barthomley at his trial. The evidence for this would have come from the Parish registers, but the page required mysteriously disappeared. Many early accounts of the Massacre of Barthomley were based on the writings of Edward Burghall, the Rector of nearby Acton Church. His account, entitled ’Providence Improved’, was written between 1628 and 1663, and published in 1778. In 1882, a diary was unearthed in the library of Mr. Reginald Cholmondeley, of Shropshire. It was supposedly written by Thomas Malbon in 1651, who was the son and rightful heir of George Malbon of Bradley Hall, at nearby Haslington, which came under the Parish of Barthomley. Thomas Malbon was one of three sequestrators for the Nantwich Hundred, which, apart from Manchester, was the only town to stand up and support the Parliamentarians. Given the date, it would seem fair to suggest that both authors would have had a good knowledge of events leading up to the Civil War, but it is also fair to say that Burghall almost certainly copied his account of the Civil War, from Malbon’s entry, as the basis of the story are almost identical. ![]() The men presently fled into the Steeple, but the Enemy, by burning the Forms; Rushes; Mats, and such combustible matter, made such a Smoak, that they being stifled in the Steeple, called for quarter, which was granted by Connaught, but when they had them in their Power, they stript them all naked, and then most barbarously murthered 12 of them contrary to the Laws of Arms, Nature and Nations. This cruel Connaught cut the throat of one Mr. John Fowler, a hopeful young man, and a minor there. Only 3 of them miraculously escaped with their Life, the Rest being cruelly wounded. Upon Christmas Day, and the Day following, they made it their work to plunder in Barthomley, Crew, Haslington, Sandbach and the adjacent places, taking Men’s goods, Victualls, and Cloaths, stripping many, both Men and Women, naked. ![]() The Kinges ptie. comynge to Barthomley Churche, did sett upon the same; wherein about 20tie Neighbours where gonne for theire saufegarde. But maior Connaught, maior to Colonell Sneyde, (whom they in the Churche did take for the Lord Brereton,) wth his forces by wyelcome entred the Churche. The people wthin gatt up into the Steeple; But the Enymy burnynge formes, pewes, Rushes & the lyke, did smother theim in the Steeple that they weire Enforced to call for quarter, & yelde theim selves; wch was graunted them by the said Connaught; But when hee had theim in his power, hee caused theim all to be stripped starke Naked; And moste barbarouslie & contr'y. [contrary] to the Lawes of Armes, murthered, stabbed and cutt the Throats of 12 of theim; viz: mr John ffowler (Scholemr), Henry ffowler, mr Thomas Elcocke, James Boughey, Randall Hassall, Richard Steele, & Richard Steele, [bis] Will'm. Steele, George Burrowes, Thomas Hollins, James Butler, & Richard Cawell; & wounded all the reste, leavinge many of theim for Dead. And on Christmas daye, and Ste. Stevens Daye, the[y] Contynued plu'dringe & destroyinge all Barthomley, Crewe, Haslington, & the places adiacent takeing all theire goods, victualls, Clothes, and stripped many, bothe men & women, almost naked. And vpon Christmas daye 1643 , towards Nighte, another pte. of the Kinges forces, marched to Sandbach, most crewelly plu'dring & spoyling eu'yone. As you can see, these accounts of the Barthomley Massacre are very similar, but unfortunately, they are the only accounts that we have. Burghall’s re-telling of the story leaves a lot of questions unanswered. One such question remains as to why he didn’t give the names of the villagers involved, as they were readily available from Malbon’s account. Also, it seems that Burghall, with his anti-Royalist stance, may have wanted to give the impression that the twenty neighbours involved were men, women and children, and that the slaughter of these innocent people was indiscriminate. But to be fair to Burghall, he does mention the fact that Major Connought ’won’ the Church, and that Mr John Fowler was a ’hopeful young man, and a minor’, and that he ’had his throat cut’ by Connought. In his book, Barthomley Letters, the Rev. Edward Hinchcliffe suggests that John Fowler, the son of the Rector, fired a shot at the Royalist troops, killing one in the process, and provoked the onslaught that happened later. Hinchcliffe also states that Richard Fowler was the Rector at Barthomley at the time, whilst in Raymond Richards’ book, Cheshire Churches, it is said that George Mainwaring was the Rector, from 1638, whilst more confusion reigns when, in the records of 1639, the Rector is placed as being Richard Fowler, who paid money in aid of the war against Scotland. In his account of the Massacre, Burghall describes Fowler as being a minor, whilst Malbon says that he is, in fact, a schoolmaster, but of course, in that era, he could have been both. Also Burghall states that three of the 20 neighbours escaped injury, with the rest being injured, whilst Malbon states the names of the dead, and says that the rest were wounded. Whatever happened on that fateful day, on 23rd December, 1643, whether Fowler fired upon the Royalist troops or whether their attack was unprovoked, will, probably, never be known, but it will forever go down in history as one of the most appalling crimes recorded at the time of the Civil War. Selected Bibliography Barthomley; the Story of an Estate Village, edited by Robert Speake |
As
you can see, Cheshire Ghosts and Hauntings is still under construction,
but please be patient as more and more ghosts and hauntings of Cheshire
are going to be added over the coming weeks... |
| Copyright©www.cheshireghostsandhauntings.org.uk/ All Rights Reserved |